Case Summary
This case involves plaintiffs Reena and Aadithya who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction from their leased property. The plaintiffs contend that they have received threats of eviction despite being tenants and paying rent regularly.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against dispossessing the plaintiffs from the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from forcibly evicting them and directing the defendants to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their tenancy rights.
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their tenancy rights.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their tenancy rights.
The court found the evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their tenancy rights.
Supporting Evidence
The apprehension of the plaintiffs is well established by the oral evidence of the PW1. The suit is liable to be decreed and I do so.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant No 2 his men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the plaint schedule property otherwise than by due process of law.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reena,T
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aadithya.A
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunhi Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ibrahim Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Rent receipt, Acknowledgment of Money Order.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.M.K.Sareena
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendant No 2 his men and agents are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the plaint schedule property otherwise than by due process of law.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant No 2 directed to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The defendant No 2 is directed to pay the costs of the proceedings to the plaintiffs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Rent Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Rent receipt submitted as evidence.
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Rent Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Rent receipt submitted as evidence.
Reference:
A1(a)
Document Type:
Money Order Acknowledgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of Money Order submitted as evidence.
Reference:
A2
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Oral evidence
Relevance:
Testimony supporting the plaintiffs' claim.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Landlord tenant relationship
Case Code
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction