Case Summary
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation and the defendants' lack of instructions.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shajahan TP
- Party Age
- 46
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Moideen P
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasak @ Abdul Rasak
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Gafoor
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Azeez P
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Majeed
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Fasil TK
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Babu Benedict
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff requested a perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction