Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Summary

Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court granted the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, ensuring she can access the property.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Permanent prohibitory injunction preventing the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff and her family from entering the property.

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The court granted the plaintiff a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, ensuring she can access the property.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff confirmed her right to access the property.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff confirmed her right to access the property.

Supporting Evidence

The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext.A1 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.The defendant and his men are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the plaintiff and her family from entering into house No. 27/1966 of Kozhikode Corporation and the plaint schedule property and from visiting her mother and treating her.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Snehaja PV
Party Age: 53
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Syam Sachith
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed No.2544/1973 of SRO, Chevayur executed by Gangadharan and others in favour of Dhamodharan.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Anil Viswanath
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The defendant and his men are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff and her family from entering into the house and the plaint schedule property.

Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.The defendant and his men are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the plaintiff and her family from entering into house No. 27/1966 of Kozhikode Corporation and the plaint schedule property and from visiting her mother and treating her.

Relief Type: Recovery

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Evidence:

The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Jenmam assignment deed

Submitted By: Plaintiff

Relevance:

Used to establish the plaintiff's claim over the plaint schedule property.

Reference:

Ext.A1

Case Classification