Similar Cases
Based on: Original Suit No : 222/2016 — Case between Raghuveer vs Sree Vettakkorumakan Kshethram et al regarding mandatory injunction and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 242/2020
Case between Edoli Pankajam vs Pulparambil Aneesh, Ralanth Kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Edoli Pankajam, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction and recovery of possession against the defendants, Pulparambil Aneesh and Ralanth Kumar, regarding a property related to the Poloor Subramania Temple. The defendants, a committee associated with the temple, argue that the suit lacks necessary parties and is not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 110 / 2022
Case between Roopa Narayan Misra vs Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Roopa Narayan Misra is the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants, which include the Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple and others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.358/2017
Case between Koroth Sandhya vs Dr.K.P.Ravi et al regarding easement rights over plaint B schedule road.
The plaintiffs, Koroth Sandhya and others, are involved in a dispute against Dr.K.P.Ravi and Dr.Shamil.P.R regarding easement rights over a road serving their property. The plaintiffs claim the right to use this road, which the defendants attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 992/2012
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
The plaintiffs, members of the Mannazhath family, are suing to declare their right to manage the Balabhadra Temple, claiming that a committee formed by certain individuals is unlawfully interfering with temple administration. The defendants, a managing committee, argue that the temple is owned by the blacksmith community and that the plaintiffs have no rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 847/2018
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
M.C. Antony, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam, the defendant, to prevent forcible eviction from his business property. The case revolves around the claim of ownership and possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1035 /20 216
Case between Valsala Krishnankutty et al vs Mattammel Sree Subramania Swamy Temple et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Valsala Krishnankutty and her children, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are associated with a temple. The plaintiffs contend that they are the rightful owners of a pathway necessary for accessing their property and allege the defendants are attempting to block this access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 294/2006
Case between Sumitha Rahim et al vs Ramachandran et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs
The plaintiffs are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, who are the office bearers of neighboring properties. The plaintiffs claim ownership of the properties and allege that the defendants are attempting to interfere with their possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 23 / 2016
Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Alias, claims ownership of a property and seeks to prevent the defendants from encroaching upon it and to recover damages for tree removal. The defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership, claiming the property is dedicated to a deity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 521/2009
Case between The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple, represented by Baburajan. V. vs Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji et al regarding dismissal for default.
The Deity of Pazhanjannur Sree Subrahmaniya Temple is the plaintiff represented by Baburajan. V., and the defendants include Unniathan @ AP Bava Haji and others. The case was dismissed for default as the counsel was not aware of the listing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.104/2022
Case between Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram et al vs Kuruppathodi Dinesh regarding dismissal for default.
This case involves Maalikayil Bhagavathi Kshethram as the plaintiff and Kuruppathodi Dinesh as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence during the trial.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.531/2015
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, P.Premi and Sunila, seek recovery of possession and a mandatory injunction against the defendants, M.Rijeesh and others, who have allegedly encroached upon their property. The court found that the defendants had constructed structures on the plaintiffs' land without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.08/2022
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
The plaintiff, Bineesh, filed a suit against Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair and others regarding access to a pathway serving his property. The defendants were absent during the hearing and raised claims over the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.35/2021
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
Malayil Balan filed a suit to restrain Nikhil from trespassing onto the scheduled property belonging to Balan's son-in-law. Nikhil counterclaimed for a mandatory injunction to restore a pathway he claimed was unjustly blocked by Balan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 229 / 2020
Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
The plaintiffs, Narmadha and others, claim ownership and possession of a property originally held under a partition deed. They seek an injunction against the defendant, Marakkath Lal, who is the legal heir of the previous owner, to prevent trespassing into the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.573/2017
Case between Sreenivasan et al vs Thondiyil Kallyani et al regarding recovery of possession of property
The case involves Sreenivasan and his legal heirs against Thondiyil Kallyani and others, concerning the recovery of possession of a disputed property. The plaintiffs claim ownership based on title deeds while the defendants allege adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 585/2018
Case between V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed vs Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank regarding mandatory and prohibitory injunction.
V.M. Abdulkhader Muhammed is the plaintiff claiming ownership of a property and disputing a loan liability claimed by Calicut North Service Co-Operative Bank. The plaintiff asserts he never availed any loan from the bank, while the bank claims he is liable for loans taken by a friend using the property as collateral.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.139/2018
Case between Chereekandy Gopinath vs Chereekandy Vijayan et al regarding fixation of boundaries and injunction.
This case involves Chereekandy Gopinath as the plaintiff and Chereekandy Vijayan and Vipin as defendants. The plaintiff seeks to fix the boundaries of disputed properties due to alleged encroachments by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.143/2015
Case between C.Lakshmi et al vs E.P.Velayudhan et al regarding partition and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs, C.Lakshmi and others, are seeking partition of property originally owned by late Ichutty @ Imbichutty. The defendants are E.P.Velayudhan and others, who are claiming ancestral rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 575/2018
Case between Neena Anil Kumar vs Mallika @ Baby et al regarding partition and separate possession
Neena Anil Kumar filed a suit for partition and separate possession of 6/48 share of the plaint schedule property against Mallika @ Baby and others. The case involves disputes over property rights and shares among family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.253/2020
Case between Sarika vs Sarala et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Sarika, is seeking partition of properties originally belonging to Malakkal Balan and his sister Janaki. The defendants include Sarala and her sons, who deny the plaintiff's claim for partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 91 / 2021
Case between Saifudheen Ibrahim et al vs K.S.Madhusoodanan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from creating any charge or alienating property allotted to the plaintiffs per a final decree. The case involves disputes arising from a partition suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 228/2018
Case between Sheeba Kottiyedath vs K.Vipin Kumar et al regarding fixation of boundary
Sheeba Kottiyedath filed a suit against K.Vipin Kumar and Divya.K.K. to fix the boundaries between her property and that of the defendants. The defendants argued that the suit was barred by res judicata due to a previous decree in a related case.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 179/2021
Case between Vimala et al vs Santha et al regarding declaration of easement right and consequential injunction
The plaintiffs are seeking a declaration of easement rights over a disputed road they have used for access to their property for over 75 years. The defendants obstructed this access, prompting the plaintiffs to file the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 376/2019
Case between Sujitha vs Sathi et al regarding partition of property
Sujitha, the plaintiff, seeks a partition of properties originally belonging to her deceased father Ramankutty, which are currently in joint possession with the defendants. The defendants, Sathi, Bibeesh, and Rajan, contest the partition and assert their ownership rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 255 / 2021
Case between Harif PN et al vs Basheer PN et al regarding partition
This suit is for partition of the plaint B schedule property. The plaintiffs, Harif PN and Ahammed koya PV, allege that they are joint owners of the property along with various defendants who are heirs of deceased family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 197/2018
Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.
Komalam K.T. filed a suit against K. Rajan for recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of certain documents. The case revolves around property rights claimed by both the plaintiff and the defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.441/2023
Case between Swarnalatha M vs Kozhikode Corporation regarding property tax assessment
Swarnalatha M filed a suit against the Kozhikode Corporation challenging the property tax imposed on her flat, claiming it to be excessive compared to adjacent properties. She sought a declaration for reassessment and a prohibitory injunction against revenue recovery proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.289/2019
Case between Abdulla Barami et al vs MK Hassan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiffs, led by Abdulla Barami, sought partition of a property originally belonging to their predecessors. They allege that defendant MK Hassan, prior to his death, mismanaged the property and income derived from it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 175 / 2022
Case between Ibrahim vs Balakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Ibrahim is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Balakrishnan and his children who are obstructing access to his property. The case revolves around the usage of a 4-foot pathway that Ibrahim claims is the only access to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 662/2017
Case between Girish .M vs Sreenivasan.M et al regarding partition of property
Girish .M is the plaintiff seeking partition of property against Sreenivasan.M and several others who are the defendants. The case revolves around the division of property originally owned by their deceased father, M. Raghavan.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 774/2015
Case between Padmini vs Yasodha P regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Padmini and Nidheesh seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from evicting them from their property. The plaintiffs allege that they are the lawful occupants of the property and have faced threats of eviction from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 914/2019
Case between Sadasivan et al vs Valiyedath Subhadra et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Sadasivan and others, are seeking a partition of a property which they claim is co-owned with the defendants, Valiyedath Subhadra and others. The case revolves around the rights over a property originally belonging to their ancestor, Kunjipennu.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.317/2023
Case between P.A.Sajeed vs Muhammed Shihab regarding mandatory injunction and damages
The case involves P.A.Sajeed as the plaintiff and Muhammed Shihab as the defendant. The plaintiff is seeking a mandatory injunction for the defendant to vacate the premises and damages for unauthorized occupation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.875/2018
Case between K.Thankamani vs Valappil Nadeera regarding recovery of possession
K. Thankamani filed a suit against Valappil Nadeera for recovery of possession of property based on a title established by an earlier court judgment which declared a cancellation deed void. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant has no rights to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 01/2017
Case between Ramanattukara Scheduled caste Service Co-operative Society vs Assistant Engineer, N.H. Bypass Division et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction and compensation
The plaintiff, Ramanattukara Scheduled Caste Service Co-operative Society, seeks a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are involved in the construction of a flyover. The suit aims to prevent the defendants from trespassing on the plaintiff's property and causing interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 55/2024
Case between Vanaja Shanmughan vs Neelakandan et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Vanaja Shanmughan, is seeking a partition of property that was previously owned by her mother and siblings. The defendants, who are related to the plaintiff, did not appear in court and were declared exparte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Ahammed koya S.V. vs Bichu et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
The plaintiff, Ahammed koya S.V., seeks declaration and recovery of possession of property claimed to be his late mother's. The defendants, Bichu and others, contest this claim, asserting rights over the property based on a gift from the plaintiff's mother.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 779/2023
Case between Sreedharan et al vs Rajesh et al regarding partition of property.
The plaintiffs, led by Sreedharan, seek a partition of property originally owned by Unnikandan and subsequently inherited. The defendants, Rajesh, Kalyani, and Rajeev, have not participated in the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won