Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 197/2018

Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-7 years
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Komalam K.T. filed a suit against K. Rajan for recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of certain documents. The case revolves around property rights claimed by both the plaintiff and the defendant.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of possession and injunction against the defendant. The plaintiff failed to establish her title over the disputed properties.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiff for recovery of possession and injunction against the defendant. The plaintiff failed to establish her title over the disputed properties.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish her right over the properties claimed based on insufficient identification.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to establish her right over the properties claimed based on insufficient identification.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has not succeeded in establishing her right over plaint A and D schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Komalam K.T.
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Rajan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original partition deed No.835/1981, Registration copy of Karayma Kachit executed by Rarichakutty, Registration copy of Assignment deed No.799/1944.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C. Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.G. Sreejith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for recovery of possession of plaint D schedule property.
Evidence:
The court concluded that plaintiff has failed to establish her right over plaint D schedule property.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for a permanent prohibitory injunction against trespass on plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The court found against the plaintiff and refused the request for an injunction.
Relief Type: Rectification
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Request for rectification of Documents No. 532/98, 566/98 of Kozhikode SRO.
Evidence:
No evidence was provided to prove that the documents should be rectified.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's ownership over the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Karayma Kychit
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the original transfer of the plaint C schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the transfer of rights over the plaint C schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents ownership of the property obtained from the Land Tribunal.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Petition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Relates to buying the land owner's rights.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's payment of taxes for property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A6, Ext.A10 to Ext.A17 (series)
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided a clear identification of the plaint schedule properties.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Jenmam assignment deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Shows the assignment of property rights to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirms transfer of property rights to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.X2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of Possession
Case Code
Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.
Case Code Year
Case between Komalam K.T. vs K. Rajan regarding recovery of possession, prohibitory injunction and for rectification and partial cancellation of documents.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Narmadha et al vs Marakkath Lal regarding permanent injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Malayil Balan vs Nikhil regarding injunction restraining trespass
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Koroth Sandhya vs Dr.K.P.Ravi et al regarding easement rights over plaint B schedule road.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bineesh vs Thekkedath Sreenivasan Nair et al regarding declaration of right and injunction.
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Premi et al vs M.Rijeesh et al regarding recovery of possession and consequential injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won