Case Summary
Roopa Narayan Misra is the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants, which include the Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple and others. The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff's representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not have representation, and no evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roopa Narayan Misra
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- Rep by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Virattamkandy Sri Baghavathy Kshethra Paripalana Samithy
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- Rep by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raveendran K
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.EK Santhoshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Adv.P Girish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaint was presented for perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Roopa Narayan Misra vs Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Roopa Narayan Misra vs Diety Of Virattamkandy Sri. Bhagavathi Temple et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.