Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.434/2024

Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-2 years 8 months
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri as the plaintiff seeking mandatory injunction and arrears of licence fee from the defendant Hashim.O.N. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has arrears of licence fees for the property entrusted for business purposes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the property and pay arrears of licence fees along with compensation for unauthorized occupation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction to vacate the property and pay Rs.1,65,000/- as licence fee arrears with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to vacate the property and pay arrears of licence fees along with compensation for unauthorized occupation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his case with unchallenged evidence and documents supporting the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his case with unchallenged evidence and documents supporting the claim.
Supporting Evidence
I find that the plaintiff had proved his case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1)The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate from the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hashim.O.N.
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer notice, Licence agreement executed between plaintiff and defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.G.Manohar Lal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amrutha Bindu.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate from the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,65,000/- as licence fee arrears with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,65,000/- (Rupees one lakh sixty five thousand only) as licence fee arrears with future interest.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.15,000/- per month for unauthorized use and occupation.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) per month for the unauthorized use and occupation of the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
To seek payment of arrears of licence fee and to surrender possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the business property.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 08/25/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi Nair vs Al Falcon Computers India Pvt.Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won