Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.177/2023

Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-04-10
Duration
approximately-2 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 04/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Raveendran, the plaintiff, entered into an agreement for sale with the defendant Muhammed Askar for a property. The defendant failed to hand over the necessary documents or return the advance payment, prompting the plaintiff to file this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,12,000/- with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.2,12,000/- with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay the plaintiff an amount of Rs.2,12,000/- with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and sufficiently proved the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and sufficiently proved the case.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and PW2 and the documents produced remains unchallenged. As such, I find that the plaintiff had proved his case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,12,000/- (Rupees two lakhs twelve thousand only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendran
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Askar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for sale executed between Plaintiff and defendant (Ext.A1, dated 30.07.2022).
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Satheesan Vazhayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Jasmin.A.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,12,000/- with future interest to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.2,12,000/- (Rupees two lakhs twelve thousand only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
2) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for sale
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document produced to substantiate the plaintiff's evidence regarding the agreement for sale.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 07/30/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 04/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi Nair vs Al Falcon Computers India Pvt.Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won