Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.315/2024

Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-02-03
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Dhanya, lent Rs.1,00,000 to the defendant, Divya, who failed to repay the amount. The case involves a promissory note and a cheque that was returned due to insufficient funds.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs.1,19,200 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.1,19,200 with interest and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendant to pay Rs.1,19,200 with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her case through unchallenged evidence and documentary proof.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved her case through unchallenged evidence and documentary proof.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by her remains unchallenged. As such, I find that the plaintiff had proved her case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows:- 1)The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,19,200/- (Rupees one lakh nineteen thousand two hundred only) with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dhanya
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Divya
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Promissory Note, Certified copy of receipt, Certified copy of Cheque no.128651 of UCO Bank, Mavoor Branch, Copy of return memo, Copy of lawyer notice, Certified copy of postal receipt, Certified copy of acknowledgment, Certified copy of ozhimuri Deed no.3587/2014 of SRO Mavoor
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P.Surendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nidhin Das.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.1,19,200/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1)The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,19,200/- with future interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realize costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
2)The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishes the borrower's promise to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document serves as proof of the financial transaction between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by defendant as a repayment method, which was later dishonored.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant to demand payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of the lawyer notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment received from the defendant regarding the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5(b)
Document Type: Ozhimuri deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting document, although not directly related to the financial transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 02/14/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi Nair vs Al Falcon Computers India Pvt.Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won