Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 570/2024

Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-02-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s.Sun packers, is seeking recovery of a payment from the defendant, M/s.Benito PU Foot wear, for corrugated boxes sold on credit. The defendant firm failed to respond or pay the amount due.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decreed in favor of the plaintiff, awarding the amount claimed along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,88,167/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has decreed in favor of the plaintiff, awarding the amount claimed along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the claim for payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the claim for payment.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by him remains unchallenged. As such, I find that the plaintiff had proved his case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows:- 1)The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,88,167/- (Rupees one lakh eighty eight thousand one hundred and sixty seven only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s.Sun packers
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s.Benito PU Foot wear
Plaintiffs Documents
Acknowledgment of Registration of firms, Partnership Deed, Certified ledger extract, True copy of lawyer notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P.K.Dharmaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,88,167/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,88,167/- (Rupees one lakh eighty eight thousand one hundred and sixty seven only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Acknowledgment of Registration of firms
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to substantiate the existence of the plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to establish the partnership structure of the plaintiff firm.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Certified ledger extract
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to demonstrate the financial transactions between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show the notice sent to the defendant for recovery of dues.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s.Sun packers vs M/s.Benito PU Foot wear regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Syed Abdurahiman Jiffri vs Hashim.O.N. regarding mandatory injunction, arrears of licence fee and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raveendran vs Muhammed Askar regarding realisation of advance amount
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanya vs Divya regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ravi Nair vs Al Falcon Computers India Pvt.Ltd. et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won