Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 230/2021

Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-01-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 1 month
Case Closed
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of Premarajan Nair, are seeking their share of a fixed deposit amount after the defendant, the nominee, withdrew it without distributing the share. The suit arises from the defendants' refusal to pay the plaintiffs their entitled amount from the fixed deposit left by the deceased Madhavi Amma.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendant to pay them their entitled share of the fixed deposit amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant directed to pay Rs.33,904/- with interest and costs to the plaintiffs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendant to pay them their entitled share of the fixed deposit amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The nominee has a duty to distribute the fixed deposit amount among all legal heirs, which the defendant failed to do.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The nominee has a duty to distribute the fixed deposit amount among all legal heirs, which the defendant failed to do.
Supporting Evidence
The status of a nominee to a bank deposit is an agent only, to receive the amount from the bank. The nominee is a trustee and all legal heirs have the right over it.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.33,904/- (Rupees thirty three thousand nine hundred and four only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiffs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajalakshmi.K
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aadithya Premarajan
Party Age
24
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thejas Premaraj
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Savithri Amma
Party Age
62
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lawyer notice dated 10.12.2020, Postal receipt, Postal acknowledgment, Copy of lawyer notice sent by defendant advocate, Statement of account numbered 4011110022617.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sindu.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Indulekha.C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.Raj Mohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are entitled to recover an amount of Rs.33,904/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.33,904/- (Rupees thirty three thousand nine hundred and four only) with future interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiffs.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiffs are also entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are also entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to notify the defendant regarding the claim for the fixed deposit amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document served as proof of sending the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the reply notice sent by the defendant's advocate.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provided details of the fixed deposit account related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount
Case Code Year
Case between Rajalakshmi.K et al vs Savithri Amma regarding realisation of amount

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 01/28/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sreenadhitha.S.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding not pressed suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between P.M.Viswanathan vs Mandattil Geetha regarding damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Secretary E.C. Muhammed vs Kakuzhiyil Pathumma et al regarding Civil Procedure Code Section 26 Order VII R Caram
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Sajeesh.P vs Abdul Salam et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed