Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. 2/ 2023

Case between Syam vs Thasneem et al regarding rental agreement dispute

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-13
Duration
Case Code No.
2
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Syam, is involved in a dispute regarding an eviction suit and allegations of forgery related to a rental agreement with the original landlord's heirs. The petitioner claims to have a prior valid rental agreement while the respondents allege a renewed agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition for initiating proceedings under section 340 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed as the court found no grounds for such initiation. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition for initiating proceedings under section 340 of the Cr.P.C. was dismissed as the court found no grounds for such initiation. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the allegations of forgery were not sufficient to initiate proceedings under section 340 of the Cr.P.C.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
There are a plethora of decisions which would go to show that for initiating proceedings u/s 340 of the Cr.P.C, 1973, the alleged act should be committed within four walls of the court. Here, there is no such case for the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thasneem
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Resvin
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rizvan
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Sunil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. F. Nahas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Initiation of proceedings u/s 340 of the Cr.P.C, 1973.
Evidence:
So this court finds force in the argument urged by the learned counsel for the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Forgery of document
Case Code
R.C.P.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Varkala, Thiruvananthapuram District
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won