Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 292/2015

Case between Sasi vs Girija regarding settlement of disputes

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-17
Duration
approximately-9 years 0 days
Case Closed
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sasi, the plaintiff, and Girija, the defendant, settled their disputes through out of court discussions. They filed a joint compromise which was accepted by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties and decreed the suit accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by both parties and decreed the suit accordingly.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Joint compromise and commission report and survey plan dated 04.10.2023 submitted by Advocate Mr. S. Sunil Kumar will form part of the decree.

Judgment Evidence:

The court heard and perused the records including the joint compromise. Joint compromise is accepted. Since the terms are lawful. Hence the suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sasi
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o Late Neelakantan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o Meenakshi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adarsh
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o Satheesan
Plaintiffs Documents
Joint compromise
Defendants Documents
Joint compromise

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.S. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Vysakh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Additional Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Court
Advocate Name
Mr. S. Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court decreed the suit in terms of the joint compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is decreed in terms of joint compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Joint Compromise and Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the joint compromise as lawful and decreed the suit in those terms.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The survey plan dated 04.10.2023 submitted by Advocate Mr. S. Sunil Kumar will form part of the decree.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sasi vs Girija regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Sasi vs Girija regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won