ORIGINAL SUIT No. 365/2019

Case between Rajila Beevi vs Rahila Beevi regarding dismissal of suit and counter claim

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA

Judge

Sri. ARAVIND P.

Order Date

2025-02-01

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajila Beevi and Rahila Beevi are involved in this case regarding a suit and counter claim. The court dismissed both the suit and the counter claim for default due to the absence of both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief

Interim Order

The court dismissed both the suit and the counter claim for default due to the absence of both parties and no evidence being adduced.

Judgment Favored

Dismissed

Relief Granted

Case Type

Original Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed both the suit and the counter claim for default due to the absence of both parties and no evidence being adduced.

Key Reasoning:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. No steps taken in counter claim to adduce evidence in counter claim. Hence the counter claim also dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rajila Beevi
Party Age: 38
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rahila Beevi
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Perumathura A. Nizar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Madhusoodhanan L.R.
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. V. Deepesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to no representation and no evidence adduced.

Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.