Case Summary
Rajeswari. V.G is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Nayana and others. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiff did not turn up despite repeat opportunities provided.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence despite multiple chances given by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal.
Plaintiff did not appear in court, leading to dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
It is noted that repeat opportunities provided. Even then the plaintif is not turning up.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeswari. V.G
- Relation
- W/o Late Ramesh Kurup
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nayana
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o Rameshkurup
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Naveena
- Party Age
- 31
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nandana
- Party Age
- 21
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Merly. G.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not turning up.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajeswari. V.G vs Nayana et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeswari. V.G vs Nayana et al regarding dismissal for default.