Case Summary
The plaintiff Rajeev is involved in a suit against Rajan @ Ramarajan and others. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeev
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan @ Ramarajan
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binu
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajeev
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayasree
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Bilahari G.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. D. Anilkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajeev vs Rajan @ Ramarajan et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeev vs Rajan @ Ramarajan et al regarding dismissal for default.