Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 144/2020

Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding dispute settlement

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff Rajan and the defendants Sasankan and the Manager of Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd. The dispute was resolved through mediation, leading to a settlement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement, dismissing the case against the second defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the mediation report and decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement, dismissing the case against the second defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The disputes between the parties were settled through mediation, and the terms of the settlement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The disputes between the parties were settled through mediation, and the terms of the settlement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The court accepted the mediation report, since the terms are lawful. So the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit against D2 is dismissed as not pressed. The court heard and perused the records included the mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasankan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manager, Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Shali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The court heard and perused the records included the mediation report. Mediation report is accepted, since the terms are lawful. So the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding dispute settlement
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding dispute settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won