Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 144/ 2020

Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding a civil dispute

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-4 years
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Rajan as the plaintiff and Sasankan and a Manager from Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd. as defendants. The parties settled their disputes through mediation, leading to a decree based on the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit against the second defendant was dismissed as not pressed, and the suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement arrived at between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the mediation agreement
Case Type
Original Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit against the second defendant was dismissed as not pressed, and the suit was decreed in terms of the mediation agreement arrived at between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a lawful settlement through mediation, accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a lawful settlement through mediation, accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The court heard and perused the records included the mediation report. Mediation report is accepted since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. Mediation agreement and the plan will form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasankan
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manager, Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Devadas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. B. Shali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joy Bhaskar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The court heard and perused the records included the mediation report. Mediation report is accepted since the terms are lawful.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Original Suit
Category
Settlement and Mediation
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding a civil dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Rajan vs Sasankan et al regarding a civil dispute

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Fri, 01/31/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Nancy vs Reeja regarding rejection of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thulaseedharan vs Shine regarding abatement of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shine vs Thulaseedharan regarding abatement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh vs Sofiya regarding settlement of disputes
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahida Beevi et al vs Nahas et al regarding joint compromise settlement.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Original Suit Plaintiff Won