| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4326 - 4330 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between A.J. Amirth Singh Nayakom et al vs CSI, South Kerala Diocese et al regarding declaration of proceedings invalid and permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No.635/2022

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abhilash Vidyadharan vs M.Naseera regarding rejection of plaint.

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1051/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-23

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Sathi.V vs Francis et al regarding recovery of possession and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Civil Suit

OS.No.1063/2014

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-23

approximately-10 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Divakaran, Chandrika vs Beela. L regarding perjury proceedings

Unknown

OS.545/1998

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-11-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Divakaran et al vs Sheela Vincent et al regarding reopening evidence and production of documents

Civil Suit

OS.No.545/1998

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-23

approximately-27 years 4 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees or batta, leading to dismissal of their cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or the means of the respondents.

Found in 21 cases (21%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Plaintiffs often did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices or appearing in court.

Found in 19 cases (19%) Medium Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to appear or represent themselves in court.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps in Case

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?