O.S. No.1051/2023

Case between Abhilash Vidyadharan vs M.Naseera regarding rejection of plaint.

Court

COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I

Judge

Sri. Manesh S.V

Order Date

2025-07-23

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Abhilash Vidyadharan, brought a suit against the defendant, M.Naseera. The court found that the plaintiff did not remit the balance court fee despite being given several opportunities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee after several postings. The case was finally heard and decided in this order.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The plaintiff's plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee after several postings. The case was finally heard and decided in this order.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court directions regarding court fee.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court directions regarding court fee.

Supporting Evidence

No representation for plaintiff. Balance court fee not remitted despite several successive postings for the same and specific direction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected under order VII rule 11(C) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Abhilash Vidyadharan
Party Age: 36

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: M.Naseera
Party Age: 43
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. Shanavas. M
Appearance Type: Main Counsel
Law Firm: M/s Loyal constructions

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. Vishnu. S. Panicker
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The plaint was rejected due to non-remittance of balance court fee.

Evidence: