| Niyamam AI

Displaying 4306 - 4310 of 15270

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between M/s.Saj Distributors et al vs M/s.Bharti Airtel Limited et al regarding arbitration of a dispute

Civil Suit

O.S. No.1933/2019

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-21

approximately-6 years 3 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between S.Vijayan vs Sreekumaran Thambi.G regarding Suit for realization of money.

Civil Suit

OS.No.735/2023

Thiruvananthapuram

2025-07-21

approximately-2 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Riyas.B et al regarding rejection of plaint

Civil Suit

OS. No.795/2023

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Canara Bank vs Akhil A.S. et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S. No.741/2024

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-21

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Jayamon Anand regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

OS.No.353/2020

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

2025-07-21

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 15,270 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.3 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 807 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 682 cases)
Sale deed (in 574 cases)
Postal receipt (in 543 cases)
Tax receipt (in 530 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 7721
Defendant Won: 6453

6453

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Evidence

Plaintiffs did not present sufficient evidence to support their claims, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Petitioners failed to pay necessary fees such as batta, causing their cases to be dismissed.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Plaintiffs were absent during court proceedings, resulting in automated case dismissals.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Required Notices

Plaintiffs did not take steps to issue notices to defendants, which led to case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Evidence

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Absence of Petitioners

Failure to Issue Required Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?