Case Summary
The plaintiff, Union Bank of India, represented by its Senior Manager, was involved in a suit against Jayamon Anand, a proprietor. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps.
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps.
The plaintiff did not appear in court and failed to take necessary steps.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is neither present nor represented even after repeated calling of the case.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayamon Anand
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. R.Jagadishkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Hari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020