Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.735/2023

Case between S.Vijayan vs Sreekumaran Thambi.G regarding Suit for realization of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-2 years 7 months
Case Code No.
735
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, S.Vijayan, a Central Government employee, claims that the defendant, Sreekumaran Thambi.G, a businessman, failed to fulfill a lease agreement for a property. The plaintiff seeks the return of a sum paid for the lease as the defendant has not delivered the keys as promised.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount paid along with interest, as the defendant failed to deliver the keys and repay the sum despite various requests.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court held that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount paid along with interest, as the defendant failed to deliver the keys and repay the sum despite various requests.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged and established the defendant's liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged and established the defendant's liability.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence produced by the plaintiff remains unchallenged. Both oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 prove that 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: the suit is partly decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S.Vijayan
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumaran Thambi.G
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease Agreement dated 14.12.2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.D. Lijo Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Alen L Albin
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 6,00,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result: the suit is partly decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of 6,00,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until realization, from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result: the suit is partly decreed as follows: (b) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to establish the terms of the lease and the amount paid by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 12/14/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won