Case Summary
The petitioners, Divakaran and Chandrika, seek to initiate proceedings against Beela. L (DW6) for perjury, claiming she provided false evidence during cross-examination. The court ultimately finds that DW6 did not intend to give false evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Unknown
Final Judgment
No
The application for initiation of proceedings against DW6 for perjury is rejected by the court.
Key Reasoning:
The court concluded that DW6 did not intentionally provide false evidence.
The court concluded that DW6 did not intentionally provide false evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
This court is of the opinion that it is not necessary to initiate proceedings against DW6.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the application is rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Divakaran
- Relation
- S/o.Late Narayanan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandrika
- Relation
- W/o. Divakaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beela. L
- Relation
- D/o.D.Livingston (Late)
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.K. Radhakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Application seeking initiation of proceedings against DW6 for perjury.
Evidence:
In the result the application is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Document
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
This document is referenced in relation to the assertion made by DW6 regarding the delivery of property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Case Classification
Case Type
Unknown
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
1998