Case Summary
The case involves a petition filed by the additional defendants seeking to reopen the evidence and produce additional documents. The plaintiffs are seeking to declare ownership and title over the plaint schedule property, claiming the defendants trespassed upon it.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to reopen evidence and allow the production of additional documents was dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the reasons provided to reopen the evidence were insufficient and the petition was filed at a belated stage.
The court found that the reasons provided to reopen the evidence were insufficient and the petition was filed at a belated stage.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the reasons provided to reopen the evidence were insufficient and the petition was filed at a belated stage.
The court found that the reasons provided to reopen the evidence were insufficient and the petition was filed at a belated stage.
Supporting Evidence
The petition being filed at this belated stage for the purpose of producing the field registers is not liable to be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is dismissed. Parties shall bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Divakaran
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Chandrika
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sheela Vincent
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Remla Chrispan
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kala Manohar
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beela.L
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V.Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.K.Radhakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition to reopen evidence and produce field registers was rejected.
Evidence:
the petition being filed at this belated stage for the purpose of producing the field registers is not liable to be allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Delivery Report
Submitted By:
Defendant
Relevance:
The court permitted the delivery report as admissible evidence without proof.
Reference:
Ext B2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
1998