Private Individual

The suit for injunction was filed by plaintiffs against defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the demise of the 1st plaintiff.

Complainant alleged that the accused issued a cheque, which bounced due to 'account closed', leading to a legal action u/s 138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act.

Plaintiff Sulaikha filed a suit against defendant Kunhimarakkar Haji seeking injunction, but the suit was dismissed for default due to non-deposition of Batta.

Plaintiff seeks partition of property purchased from Ayyappan @ Kuttan, while defendants contest claiming property allotment as per their father's will.

Plaintiff Moideenkutty filed a suit seeking injunction which was later dismissed for default as plaintiff was absent.

Four petitioners filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965. The counsel for the petitioners did not press the application, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.

Petitioners comprising Thitheemu, Fathima Ruby, Muhammed Anwar, and Muhammed Ashraf filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act). The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Petitioners, represented by the late Kunhimuhammed's family members, filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act). The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

The case involves a decree holder, Kunhipathumma, along with two others, against the judgment debtor, Hyder. The execution petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Thalhath filed a restoration petition against Muthu and Subair, where parties agreed to allow the petition on specific terms after the earlier petition was allowed on payment of costs.