Private Individual

Petitioner Sethumadhavan sought execution of decree against respondent Sainudheen, but the EP was dismissed as no steps were taken.

Multiple petitions filed by owners of certain rooms seeking eviction of tenants to start a supermarket business and adjacent rooms. The tenants refused to vacate, claiming dependency on business and lack of suitable alternative.

Complainant Murali filed a case against the accused Jishi P. under section 138 of N.I. Act. The accused pleaded not guilty and was subsequently acquitted.

Rayin filed a restoration petition against Muhammed and Sulaiman, but the case was dismissed for default.

Chandran filed a suit against Kaniyaratharayil Ayyappan's children and others for partition. The court decreed the suit based on a lawful compromise agreement.

Plaintiff K. Sreedevi filed a suit for partition of the property along with past and future share of profits, claiming entitlement to a ½ share in the property and past and future profits. Defendant K. Sankaranarayanan contested the suit based on a Will executed by their father.

Plaintiff, the owner of a vehicle, filed a suit against the defendant to recover an amount of Rs. 54,763, which was due under a rental agreement for the vehicle used in a vegetable business.

Plaintiff filed a suit against Accomplish Marketing Pvt. Ltd. seeking to recover Rs. 1,30,000 and interest for 50 grams of gold taken by the defendants for investment purposes but not returned.

Plaintiff Yahutty alleged defendant Abdurahiman borrowed Rs. 10,00,000 but failed to repay, leading to a lawsuit for money realisation based on a dishonored cheque.

Plaintiffs sought mandatory injunction and damages for unauthorized occupation of their property by the defendant.