Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO.19 OF 2016

Case between Thitheemu et al vs Muhammedkutty regarding rent control

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., RENT CONTROLLER
Order Date
2017-01-03
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Tue, 01/03/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioners, represented by the late Kunhimuhammed's family members, filed a petition under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act). The petition was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition filed by the petitioners under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act) was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not applicable as the petition was dismissed
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition filed by the petitioners under section 5(1) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control Act) was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent control Act). Counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thitheemu
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fathima Ruby
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Anwar
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Ashraf
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o Late Kunhimuhammed
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammedkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Vipin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Najmath.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Applicable
Outcome: Not Applicable
Description:
Not applicable
Evidence:
Petition filed under section 5(1) of Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent control Act). Counsel for the petitioner not pressed the petition. Hence petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Thitheemu et al vs Muhammedkutty regarding rent control
Case Code Year
Case between Thitheemu et al vs Muhammedkutty regarding rent control

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/03/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 01/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Faizal.P.T et al vs Sakeer Husain regarding rent control
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Beeran Haji vs Ali regarding rent control petition
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Vanaja Valliyil regarding Rent Control
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunhimohammed Haji vs Ajith Kumar.U. regarding rent dispute
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Both (settled)
Case between Beeran Haji vs Habeeb Rehman regarding rent control
Rent Controller of Tirur
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won