Private Individual

Beeran Haji and Remya filed petitions seeking fair rent fixation due to arrears and inadequate rental amount based on market value of the property.

Chandran filed a suit against Sasidharan for recovery of Rs. 2,00,000 based on a promissory note. Sasidharan denied borrowing the amount and claimed it was security for a chit fund subscription.

Plaintiffs, including an elderly woman, sought an injunction against the defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their legal counsel.

Three plaintiffs filed a suit for injunction against multiple defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.

Mundakkora Muhammed Bappu filed a petition for execution of a civil debt against Pallikkattil Abdul Khader, who the petitioner claims has means to pay but intentionally failed to pay the decree debt.

The applicants, representing the legal heirs of the 2nd respondent in the original suit, filed a petition seeking a final decree for partition of the property according to the preliminary decree passed earlier.

Plaintiff sued for partition of property after presuming the civil death of their missing brother Ali who owned the property.

Plaintiff Haskerali filed a suit for partition which was dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and non-appearance of defendants.

Alamchambattu Bava Haji filed a suit seeking fixation of boundaries and consequential injunction due to lack of specific boundaries between his property and defendants'. Despite repeated demands and legal processes initiated, defendants did not cooperate in fixing the boundaries, leading to the lawsuit.

Shakkeela filed an execution petition against Kavumpurath Muhammadali et al, which was settled through mediation resulting in the closure of the petition.