Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018 — Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.208/2025
Case between Mohanan P.D vs The Manager, State Bank of India regarding declaration of valid title deed
The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 526/2025
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 326/2017
Case between Sasilal P vs Vinod K et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Sasilal P, is seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Vinod K and Kadalundi Gramapanchayath, for allegedly encroaching upon his property and constructing a compound wall. The defendants deny the allegations and assert that the road in question is public property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 298 OF 2015
Case between Pulikkalakath Aboobacker's children vs Naduparambil Muhammed Ali regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, children of Pulikkalakath Aboobacker, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Naduparambil Muhammed Ali, regarding a shop room they claim possession of. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant incorrectly asserts a right to occupy the shop room, which they have renovated for a new business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.328/2025
Case between K N Abdul Gafoor et al vs K N Fajar et al regarding Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, K N Abdul Gafoor and K N Shamsudheen, are seeking a prohibitory injunction against the defendants, K N Fajar and others, regarding illegal constructions on a jointly owned property. Tensions arose over property rights after the death of family members, leading to this legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 308/2025
Case between Ahmed Riza Manjalingal et al vs Adeeb Jaleel et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Ahmed Riza Manjalingal and Shahana Moinudheen are seeking a temporary injunction against Adeeb Jaleel and Omar Jaleel concerning their sports venture. They claim wrongful eviction attempts and illegal entry by the defendants after investments in property and construction of sports facilities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 167/2025
Case between Abdul Samad vs P.M.Mirsad et al regarding interim injunction.
Abdul Samad, the plaintiff, is seeking an interim injunction against P.M.Mirsad and others regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of illegal construction over a pathway claimed by the plaintiff as a public access route.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 315/2025
Case between Niyas Abdul Rahiman vs Jiji John regarding interim injunction
The plaintiff, Niyas Abdul Rahiman, seeks an interim injunction against the defendant, Jiji John, to prevent him from unlawfully fishing and trespassing on property that the plaintiff claims ownership of. The defendant argues that he has traditional fishing rights over the area in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 449/2025
Case between Subish K.S vs Sujith K.S regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Subish K.S filed a petition against his brother Sujith K.S for a temporary prohibitory injunction regarding a residential property that belonged to their late father. The case involves issues of possession and ownership rights of the property following the father's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1243/2024
Case between Neeba Rajagopal vs Corporation of Cochin et al regarding declaration and injunction
Neeba Rajagopal is the plaintiff who owns a property and seeks to prevent the Corporation of Cochin from demolishing a wall she constructed, which she claims is legally compliant. The defendants are alleged to be taking action against her property without following statutory procedures.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 653/2025
Case between Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Veeyem Developers and Builders Pvt. Ltd. seeking a temporary injunction against Tranquil Towers Apartment and Commercial space owners Association and its president Sreeju Sreedharan. The plaintiff claims interference with their construction activities related to a commercial-cum-residential project due to the defendants' actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 223/2016
Case between Nirmala Ramankutty et al vs Zahida Crockery et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Nirmala Ramankutty, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Zahida Crockery and others, regarding their access to a common area in a commercial building. The dispute revolves around the defendants allegedly trespassing on the plaintiffs' common property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 196/2018
Case between Vinod Menon et al vs Purva Oceana Apartment Owners Association et al regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, seek relief against the defendants who have obstructed their attempts to complete internal modifications in their apartment. The case involves issues of property rights and compliance with the homeowners' association regulations.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 708 of 2021
Case between Julia Luiz et al vs Smt. Thilothamma Sukumaran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Julia Luiz and Shimon Luiz, seek to prevent the defendants from interfering with their property rights over a water-logged area. The case revolves around attempts by the defendants to trespass and alter the flow of water impacting the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1396/2019
Case between Maneesh Sasidharan vs Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Maneesh Sasidharan, the managing partner of Salabham Travels, filed a suit against Daimler Financial Services India Pvt. Ltd. and others for preventing the illegal repossession of a vehicle. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants attempted to seize the vehicle without due process of law.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1297/2019
Case between Concert O Castle Owners Association vs Licy Kurian et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Concert O Castle Owners Association, is seeking relief against the defendants, Licy Kurian and Thomas George, for unauthorized constructions and alterations made by the defendants in a common area of the apartment complex. The case involves issues of ownership rights, registration, and modifications affecting shared property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 567/2000
Case between Mary vs Ammini @ Thressia et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession
The plaintiff, Mary, claims ownership of a property that belonged to her mother and seeks recovery of possession from the defendants, who have occupied the property. The defendants contend that the property rightfully belongs to them due to prior transactions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 297/2020
Case between Raju Jose vs Periyar Agro Farm (P) Ltd. regarding declaration of title
Raju Jose is the plaintiff claiming a declaration of title against Periyar Agro Farm (P) Ltd. The case revolves around the plaintiff's possession of land acquired through adverse possession after the defendant failed to execute a sale deed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 636/2015
Case between Valsala B Menon vs Binu A.P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
The plaintiff, Valsala B Menon, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from encroaching on a motorable road essential for access to her property. The case involves issues regarding property ownership and usage rights.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1056/2020
Case between Alexander Mathew vs BPL US West Cellular Telecommunications Pvt. Ltd, Mangalam Home and Resorts Pvt. Ltd, Mr. Sajan Varghese, Mr. Saji Varghese regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, Alexander Mathew, is involved in a dispute concerning ownership and rights to an apartment complex against multiple defendants. The case revolves around a sale deed and potential illegal claims on property by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.994/2022
Case between Thulaseedharan.B. vs Bindu et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
The petitioner, Thulaseedharan.B., filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against defendants Bindu and Geetha regarding an alleged trespass on his property. The case revolves around property ownership disputes and the right to construct on adjacent lands.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.138 /2019
Case between Syed Mohammed Sadik vs Suresh Babu. R.C regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.
Syed Mohammed Sadik and Suresh Babu. R.C are involved in two interconnected suits regarding property disputes over a pathway. The plaintiff claims that the defendant illegally encroached upon the pathway, reducing its width.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.1196/2012
Case between Aloysius E.Gomez et al vs Maglin Lobo regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Aloysius E. Gomez and his wife Mary Lobo filed a suit against Maglin Lobo regarding obstruction in a public pathway. The plaintiffs sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from constructing a roof over a portion of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1236/2020
Case between Divya Kumar.P vs Peethambaran et al regarding recovery of possession and mesne profits.
Divya Kumar.P is seeking recovery of possession of her property from her parents and sister, who are currently residing there. The plaintiff contends that the defendants are in illegal possession and has filed this suit after her attempts to evict them were unsuccessful.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.658/2019
Case between Shaji P.R vs Rajani regarding removal of encroachment and restoration of pathway
Shaji P.R filed a suit against his sister Rajani for the removal of an encroachment and restoration of a pathway that provides access to his property. The defendant allegedly constructed a wall blocking the pathway, which the plaintiff claims has caused him hardship.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.476/2021
Case between Dayanandan vs Anila Kumari et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Dayanandan, the absolute owner of a property, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against his sisters and nephew who attempted to trespass onto his property. The court found that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief due to suppression of facts.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1563/2024
Case between T.S. Jayaprakash vs M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
T.S. Jayaprakash, the plaintiff, claims that M/s Adrak Builders& Developers Pvt. LTD. has unlawfully grabbed his property. The case involves determining the rights over certain properties and includes applications for the appointment of a commissioner and surveyor.
Civil Suit
OS.No.2384/2014
Case between Shibu et al vs Bindhu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and other consequential reliefs.
The plaintiffs, Shibu and Sekharan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Bindhu, Biju, and Thankamoni, concerning a dispute over property access and construction. The case also has a counterclaim where Bindhu, the plaintiff in the second suit, contends against Shibu and Sekharan regarding property declaration and injunction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 756/2024
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
Fathima Minha.K, represented by her father Ashraf.K, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 398/2021
Case between Sajeesh.P vs Abdul Salam et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
Sajeesh.P is the plaintiff and Abdul Salam along with the Secretary, Kozhikode Corporation are the defendants. The plaintiff's counsel did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won