Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 457/2025

Case between Vinoj.S vs Vijisha Decruz et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff -II
Judge
Smt. Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vinoj.S filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against Vijisha Decruz and Gilroy De Cruz to restrain them from altering a pathway that affects his property access. The case involves issues of peaceful enjoyment of property rights.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff restraining the defendants from altering the pathway affecting property access until a specified date.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from altering the pathway.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff restraining the defendants from altering the pathway affecting property access until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from altering the nature and lie of the plaint B schedule pathway.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinoj.S
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijisha Decruz
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gilroy De Cruz @ Roy De Cruz
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev. S.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Issac Samuel (D2)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants from altering the nature and lie of the plaint B schedule pathway.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit. Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from altering the nature and lie of the plaint B schedule pathway and causing any obstructions therein affecting peaceful enjoyment of the same by the plaintiff or anybody claiming under him for gaining access to the plaint A schedule property until 09/04/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinoj.S vs Vijisha Decruz et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vinoj.S vs Vijisha Decruz et al regarding ad-interim injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Court of Additional Munsiff-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Smitha @ Salini vs Soumya. L regarding temporary injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Kootuvilakath Sakkeena Beevi M. vs Rajan regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won