Case Summary
Venkittaraman, the plaintiff, is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendants who are obstructing his right over the property. The court has heard the case and granted the injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction preventing the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's rights over the property until further notice.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case and there was a risk of the object of granting injunction being defeated by delay.
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case and there was a risk of the object of granting injunction being defeated by delay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from making any obstructions to the petitioner in enjoying his right over petition A schedule property until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Venkittaraman
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Subramaniayan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. Jayasankar
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saraswathy. P.L
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Neethu Lakshmy. R
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nipun Dev
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners from making any obstructions to the petitioner in enjoying his right over petition A schedule property until further orders.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction. Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/ defendants from making any obstructions to the petitioner in enjoying his right over petition A schedule property until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the judgment.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court reviewed the plaint while making its decision.
Reference:
Document Type:
Other Documents
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court considered other unspecified documents in its ruling.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Venkittaraman vs V. Subramaniayan et al regarding injunction