Case Summary
This case involves Thulasidharan.B and Biju among others, who are seeking an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and demolishing a compound wall. The court is addressing the urgency of the situation to protect the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiffs, preventing the defendants from trespassing on the property and demolishing the southern compound wall until March 15, 2025.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court found that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into or from demolishing the southern compound wall with the intention to cut open the pathway through the middle portion of the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thulasidharan.B
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Biju lal.B
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Usha
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.K.S Leena Chand
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Parvathy.S.L
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into or from demolishing the southern compound wall with the intention to cut open the pathway through the middle portion of the plaint schedule property and from committing any act of waste in plaint schedule property and building until 15/03/2025.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into or from demolishing the southern compound wall with the intention to cut open the pathway through the middle portion of the plaint schedule property and from committing any act of waste in plaint schedule property and building until 15/03/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025