Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.439/2021

Case between Syamala vs Rajeswari et al regarding recovery of money

Court
Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-25
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Code No.
439
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Syamala, the plaintiff, seeks recovery of money from Rajeswari and her son Sujith, claiming they borrowed ₹2,00,000 with a promise to repay. The defendants contest the claim, alleging the plaintiff has misused a document as security for a loan that was already repaid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay ₹2,00,000 with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹2,00,000 with 6% interest until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay ₹2,00,000 with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendants are liable to repay the borrowed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established that the defendants are liable to repay the borrowed amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 establishes that an amount of ₹2,00,000 is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is partly decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹2,00,000 with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realisation from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syamala
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeswari
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sujith @ Jithu
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original document dated 24.12.2019, True copy of Advocate notice dated 27.11.2020, True copy of Advocate notice dated 27.11.2020, Reply Notice dated 11.12.2020
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Suresh Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Lekshmi Ramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev.A.R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹2,00,000/- with interest.
Evidence:
the suit is partly decreed as follows: -(a)The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees Two lakhs only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realisation from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document evidences the loan of ₹2,00,000/- borrowed by the defendants from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Advocate notice and Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued by the plaintiff demanding repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Advocate notice and Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice issued to the second defendant regarding the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The reply notice from the defendants denying the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 12/24/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shibu.V et al regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Velamkanni Matha JLG Vizhinjam Unit et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Ayodhya Kudumbasree et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jyothishmathi vs Krishna Kumar regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits LTD. vs Santha et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won