Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Syamala and others, are seeking an injunction against the defendant Govind. The court granted a temporary injunction to prevent the defendant from entering the property owned by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad interim injunction granted restraining the defendant from trespassing into the petition schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim injunction in favor of the plaintiffs to prevent the defendant from interfering with their property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs demonstrated a prima facie case and need for an injunction to prevent harm.
The plaintiffs demonstrated a prima facie case and need for an injunction to prevent harm.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners/ plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the petition schedule property and the building therein.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Syamala
- Party Age
- 81
- Relation
- W/o. late Appukuttan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saju
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o. late Appukuttan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Baiju
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. late Appukuttan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Niju
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Late Appukuttan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kavitha
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o. Syamal.B
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Govind
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o. Chithambaram
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Vikraman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the petition schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the petition schedule property and the building therein and from installing or affixing any hoardings, banners or boards inside the wall of the building in the petition schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule property by the petitioners until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of the consideration for granting injunction.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the plaint as part of the consideration for granting injunction.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025