Case Summary
The petitioner Swarnamma.L seeks an ad-interim injunction against the respondents Chandrika, Sandhya, Pooja, and Lakshmy. The case involves preventing the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and interfering with her peaceful possession.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendants from interfering with her possession of the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the potential defeat of the suit's purpose due to delay.
The court found merit in the plaintiff's claims regarding the potential defeat of the suit's purpose due to delay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same or from doing anything which would affect the plaintiff’s property right over the same until 29/03/2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Swarnamma.L
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- W/o Late Balan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chandrika
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- W/o Late Kumaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sandhya
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o Late Chandrakumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pooja
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- D/o Sandhya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lakshmy
- Party Age
- 20
- Relation
- D/o Sandhya
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Swapna.N.D
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or from interfering with the plaintiff’s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the same or from doing anything which would affect the plaintiff’s property right over the same until 29/03/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025