Case Summary
Suresh Kumar.V.S filed a petition for an ad-interim injunction against Jyothishmathi and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing on the petitioner’s property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction in favor of the plaintiff, Suresh Kumar.V.S, against the defendants, restraining them from trespassing on his property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court was satisfied that the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners and their men from trespassing into the petition B scheduled property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Suresh Kumar.V.S
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jyothishmathi
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Prasanna Kumari.S.K
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sobhana Kumari.S.K
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.S. Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners and their men from trespassing into the petition B scheduled property, committing any wastes, and disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners and their men from trespassing into the petition B scheduled property and from committing any wastes in the petition B scheduled property and from disturbing the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the petition B scheduled property or from doing any act detrimental to the interest of the petitioner over the petition B scheduled property.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar.V.S vs Jyothishmathi et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar.V.S vs Jyothishmathi et al regarding injunction