Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.903/2025

Case between Sunilkumar.S vs Saji Nadarajan, Rajeev Menon Kotte regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-05-24
Duration
Case Code No.
903
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sunilkumar.S is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against Saji Nadarajan and Rajeev Menon Kotte, who are the defendants. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's use of a specific pathway.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has decided to grant an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the specified pathway until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has decided to grant an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff. The defendants are restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the specified pathway until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff made out a prima facie case and the court found that delay in granting the injunction would defeat its purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from obstructing the petitioners from using the petition C schedule pathway, by making constructions in it or from committing waste in it until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sunilkumar.S
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji Nadarajan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeev Menon Kotte
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Aswin Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Divya.J.Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from obstructing the petitioners from using the petition C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants from obstructing the petitioners from using the petition C schedule pathway, by making constructions in it or from committing waste in it until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jaibheem Ambedkar Charitable Trust represented by Thomas Joseph vs Anil Kumar.S et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDL. MUNSIFF (RCC), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Raji vs R.Uma Shankar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between City Plaza Flat Owners Association vs City Plaza Shop Owners Association et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between T. Sathyan vs T.V. Bahulayan Panicker regarding an injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won