Case Summary
The plaintiff, Sunila Sahadevan, is seeking an ad-interim injunction against the defendant, Sahadevan, to prevent the alienation or encumbrance of certain properties. The court has assessed the situation and found a prima facie case for the injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner from alienating or encumbering the properties.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff to protect the properties in question until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case, and issuing notice before granting the injunction would defeat the object of the injunction.
The petitioner has made out a prima facie case, and issuing notice before granting the injunction would defeat the object of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad - interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner from alienating or encumbering the petition schedule properties under the strength of power of attorney No.416/2024 dated 27.12.2024 of SRO Pattom with respect to the petition B schedule property and power of attorney No.12-619/22 dated 07.02.2022 of District Registrar (GL) Thiruvananthapuram with respect to petition C schedule item Nos.1 and 2 properties until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sunila Sahadevan
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sahadevan
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Vellarada Rethin.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner from alienating or encumbering the petition schedule properties.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to support the injunction granted regarding the petition schedule properties.
Reference:
No.416/2024 dated 27.12.2024
Document Type:
Power of Attorney
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Referenced in the context of the injunction regarding specific properties.
Reference:
No.12-619/22 dated 07.02.2022
Document Type:
Oral Evidence
Submitted By:
Oral evidence
Relevance:
The court heard the learned counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff and perused the affidavit and plaint.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025