Case Summary
Sudha Satheesh Kumar has filed a petition against Meenakshy Ammal and others seeking a temporary injunction to prevent eviction from her property. The court has heard the petitioner and granted the injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining eviction from the scheduled property
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court has granted a temporary injunction preventing the defendants from evicting the plaintiff from her property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case and noted that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
The court found a prima facie case and noted that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found a prima facie case and noted that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
The court found a prima facie case and noted that delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this I.A will defeat the purpose of injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants 1 to 6 or their agents from evicting the plaintiff from the scheduled property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sudha Satheesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Meenakshy Ammal
- Party Age
- 89
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. Janaki Ammal
- Party Age
- 87
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. Lakshmi Ammal
- Party Age
- 84
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P. Sundarambal
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayana Iyer
- Party Age
- 92
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Executive Engineer, Kerala State Housing Board
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and supporting documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.K.Padmakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Request for temporary injunction restraining the counter petitioners from evicting the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants 1 to 6 or their agents from evicting the plaintiff from the scheduled property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to support the petitioner's request for a temporary injunction.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sudha Satheesh Kumar vs Meenakshy Ammal et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sudha Satheesh Kumar vs Meenakshy Ammal et al regarding temporary injunction