Case Summary
Dr.Yamuna Prasad and Dr.Asha Prasad are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against the PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association and its Secretary, Sajith S.Pillai. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from removing and damaging certain boards.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from removing and damaging the boards.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs had made out a prima facie case. An ad-interim injunction was granted to prevent the defendants from removing and damaging certain boards.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection against potential harm.
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection against potential harm.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection against potential harm.
The plaintiffs established a prima facie case requiring immediate protection against potential harm.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants and their men from removing and damaging the plaint B schedule Boards, until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr.Yamuna Prasad
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Dr.Asha Prasad
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- PRS Krishna Apartment and Commercial Space Owners Welfare Association
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sajith S Pillai
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.K.K.Rajeev Punnapuram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sangeetha R.V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction was granted restraining the defendants from removing and damaging the plaint B schedule Boards.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that the petitioners/plaintiffs has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction. Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioners/defendants and their men from removing and damaging the plaint B schedule Boards, until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court perused the affidavit as part of its decision process.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court considered the plaint in making the ruling.
Reference:
Document Type:
Other Documents
Submitted By:
Unknown
Relevance:
The court mentioned other documents without specifying them.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025