Case Summary
The case involves Preethi Paul as the petitioner who is seeking an injunction against Dr.Sheela.K.Pillai. The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing and causing disturbance.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to the plaintiff against the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case, and granting the injunction was necessary to prevent delay that could defeat its purpose.
The petitioner/plaintiff made out a prima facie case, and granting the injunction was necessary to prevent delay that could defeat its purpose.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner/plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and that object of granting injunction would be defeated by delay if notice is issued before granting injunction.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into plaint ‘A’ schedule property and from causing any disturbance to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff over the same until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Preethi Paul
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dr.Sheela.K.Pillai
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit, plaint and other documents.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.V.Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into the plaint 'A' schedule property.
Evidence:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendant from trespassing into plaint ‘A’ schedule property and from causing any disturbance to the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff over the same until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Affidavit
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court reviewed the affidavit submitted by the plaintiff as part of the hearing.
Reference:
Document Type:
Plaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the plaint filed by the plaintiff in reaching its decision.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025