Case Summary
Getthakumari filed a petition seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sivakumar.V, the Secretary of the corporation of Thiruvananthapuram, and Binu.V. The case involves a property dispute where Getthakumari claims the defendants are trespassing on her property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction against trespassing into the property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to Getthakumari, restraining the defendants from trespassing or doing any acts detrimental to her property until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court found the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The court found the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents or any other persons claiming under them from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Getthakumari
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivakumar.V
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Secretary corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Binu.V
- Party Age
- 35
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Nemom. V. Sanjeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anuja.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Annie.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Uma.U.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Sunitha. S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents or any other persons claiming under them from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents or any other persons claiming under them from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or any portion there of and from doing any act or acts detrimental to the title, possession and peaceful enjoyment of the plaint schedule property by the petitioner/plaintiff except in accordance with due process of Law until 15/03/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Getthakumari vs Sivakumar.V et al regarding injunction against trespassing into property.
Case Code Year
Case between Getthakumari vs Sivakumar.V et al regarding injunction against trespassing into property.