Case Summary
A. Subair, the petitioner and judgment debtor, was absent and unrepresented in the court. The counter petitioner and decreeholder, Subair, was represented by advocates.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was neither present nor represented.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
Supporting Evidence
The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A. Subair
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subair (A.P. Subair)
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.G. Lekshmi Sree
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Merlin John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Krishna Priya L.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EA
Case Code Year
2023