Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EA 170/2021

Case between K. Subramanian vs Sreenivasan regarding execution of a decree

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-03-28
Duration
approximately-8 years 11 days
Case Code No.
170
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves K. Subramanian as the judgment debtor and Sreenivasan as the decree holder regarding an execution petition. Subramanian claims that his belongings were wrongfully evicted and seeks re-delivery of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court granted an interim order directing an Amin to assess the property and its contents. A report is to be filed before the next hearing.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an interim order directing an Amin to assess the property and its contents. A report is to be filed before the next hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: An interim order is passed in this application by appointing an Amin with a direction to visit the decree schedule property and report on the actual status of the decree schedule property and the availability of the inventory items, which were prepared by the Amin on 13/08/2007.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Subramanian
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreenivasan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. M.K Valsala Kumari
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S Binod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An interim order is passed in this application by appointing an Amin with a direction to visit the decree schedule property and report on the actual status of the decree schedule property and the availability of the inventory items.
Evidence:
Hence, this court is of the view that before making any final order, an interim order should be passed directing the Amin to visit the property and file a report regarding the status of the schedule property and the articles listed in the inventory.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EA
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sun, 08/13/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thankachan Yohannan Soney vs M. Suda Devi et al regarding Execution of decree
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Execution Plaintiff Won
Case between Lalitha.C vs Sunitha Chandran et al regarding Execution application
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Execution Plaintiff Won
Case between A. Subair vs Subair regarding Judgment Debtor petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Defendant Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won