Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1021/2014

Case between Lalitha.C vs Sunitha Chandran et al regarding Execution application

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-06-13
Duration
Case Code No.
1021
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Lalitha.C is the petitioner seeking execution of a decree against judgment debtors Sunitha Chandran, Asas Andrews, and V.K.Rajendran. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner and a Surveyor to assist in executing the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the execution application and appointed officials to assist in the decree's execution.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of an Advocate Commissioner and a Surveyor to assist in execution.
Case Type
Execution
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the execution application and appointed officials to assist in the decree's execution.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Sufficient cause for allowing the application was demonstrated.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Sufficient cause for allowing the application was demonstrated.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for allowing the application.

Judgment Evidence:

I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for allowing the application. Hence Adv. Kailas Nath C/o Adv.S.V.Rajan is appointed as Adv. Commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Lalitha.C
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunitha Chandran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Asas Andrews
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.K.Rajendran
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Asha.K.I
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Hari Prasad.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Jayasree.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner and Surveyor.
Evidence:
I am satisfied that there is sufficient cause for allowing the application. Hence Adv. Kailas Nath C/o Adv.S.V.Rajan is appointed as Adv. Commissioner. Sri. Ramesh.D.K. is appointed as Surveyor.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thankachan Yohannan Soney vs M. Suda Devi et al regarding Execution of decree
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Execution Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Subramanian vs Sreenivasan regarding execution of a decree
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Unknown
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won