Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.2063/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Sindhu.S regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi.C
Order Date
2025-02-24
Duration
approximately-6 years 1 month
Case Closed
Mon, 02/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, State Bank of India, seeks to recover money from the defendant, Sindhu.S, who defaulted on a loan. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff as the defendant failed to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,97,066.69/- from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence overwhelmingly supports the plaintiff's claim as the defendant did not contest.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence overwhelmingly supports the plaintiff's claim as the defendant did not contest.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendant was set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,97,066.69/- from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu.S
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o T.Ravi
Plaintiffs Documents
Xpress Credit Loan Application dated 14.01.2019, Sanction letter dated 22.01.2019, Personal loan agreement dated 22.01.2019, Arrangement letter dated 22.01.2019, Statement of account from 22.01.2019 to 13.09.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Rajeev Chempakassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,97,066.69/- from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1.Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹1,97,066.69/- from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 14.55% per annum with monthly rests from 14/09/2023 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
2.Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 14.55% per annum with monthly rests from 14/09/2023 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
3.Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.
Evidence:
4.Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Xpress Credit Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document submitted by the defendant to apply for a loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter indicating approval of the loan amount to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Personal Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement outlining the terms of the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Arrangement Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the arrangement of the loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Record of the loan account transactions and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Sindhu.S regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Sindhu.S regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/22/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won