Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.352/2021

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
approximately-3 years 2 months 24 days
Case Code No.
352
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Overseas Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Sukumari.C, for the realization of an outstanding loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite repeated requests and has not appeared in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, stating that Sukumari.C owes an amount of ₹45,866/- with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to realize the amount and costs from the defendant's assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹45,866/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, stating that Sukumari.C owes an amount of ₹45,866/- with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to realize the amount and costs from the defendant's assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence on record established the defendant's liability to repay the loan amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence on record established the defendant's liability to repay the loan amount.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the evidence before this court, it is found that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree in its favour.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹45,866/- (Rupees Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-Six only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Overseas Bank
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukumari.C
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o.Vijayan T
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 19/10/2017, Credit Sanction Advice dated 27/10/2017, Undertaking for Repayment of Installments dated 27/10/2017, Revised Demand Promissory Note dated 27/10/2017, Letter of Undertaking dated 27/10/2017, Revival Letter dated 12/08/2020, Advocate notice dated 14/01/2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S.Asha Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 45,866 ₹ /- (Rupees Forty-Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-Six only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the initial application for the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Credit Sanction Advice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the loan facility sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Undertaking for Repayment of Installments
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is an agreement by the defendant to repay the loan in installments.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the outstanding balance due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Revised Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is a promissory note indicating the defendant's obligation to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This indicates the defendant's commitment regarding the loan conditions after interest adjustments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of Undertaking from new borrowers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document pertains to the adjustment of interest linked with MCLR.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the defendant's acknowledgment of the loan obligation.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This serves as proof of mailing the advocate notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Agreement of Term Loan and Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the terms for the loan and the hypothecation of assets.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 10/27/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Indian Bank vs M/s Salala Mobile shop et al regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won