Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1680/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-0 years 8 months
Case Code No.
1680
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Canara Bank, which filed a suit against Jayakumar. R.V for the recovery of a loan amount due. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to an ex parte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the outstanding amount due from the defendant. The decree includes the principal amount along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹63,879.01/- with 6% interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of the outstanding amount due from the defendant. The decree includes the principal amount along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented proved the defendant's liability for the outstanding loan amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented proved the defendant's liability for the outstanding loan amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹63,879.01/- is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹63,879.01/- (Rupees Sixty-Three Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Nine and 1 paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumar. R.V
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Loan application, Agreement – cum – deed of hypothecation, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Copy of the statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Muttathara V.S Viswambharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bibina Salu. R.B
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted the right to recover ₹63,879.01 with interest
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 63,879.01₹/- (Rupees Sixty-Three Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Nine and 1 paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover the costs of the suit
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The original loan application executed by the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement – cum – deed of hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement for the loan sanctioned to the defendant
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant dated 16/03/2017
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant dated 11/04/2019
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of the debt by the defendant dated 10/03/2020
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the statement of accounts showing the outstanding due
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate Under Sec. 65B of the Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certificate relevant to the admissibility of the electronic document
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence presented by PW1 supporting the plaintiff's claims
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 05/02/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s Indian Bank vs M/s Salala Mobile shop et al regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won