Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.718/2022

Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-8 years 11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Indian Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Sanish.S.S, who failed to repay the Mudra Loan taken for running a textile business. The defendant was set ex parte for not appearing in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing the recovery of ₹3,06,494/- along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to further interest from the date of decree until realization.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,06,494/- from the defendant and his assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff allowing the recovery of ₹3,06,494/- along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to further interest from the date of decree until realization.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence from the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendant was set ex parte.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence from the plaintiff was unchallenged as the defendant was set ex parte.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of the plaintiff is unchallenged because the defendant was set ex parte and PW1 was not cross-examined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: 1. Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,06,494/- from the defendant and his assets. 2. Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.40% per annum with monthly rests from 26/05/2022 till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indian Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanish.S.S
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 12.07.2016, Sanction Letter dated 16.07.2016, Original of Demand Promissory Note dated 16.07.2016, Agreement of Hypothecation of movable dated 16.07.2016, Acknowledgment of debt cum security dated 01.07.2019, Statement of Accounts.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajayakumar.K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise ₹3,06,494/- from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to realise ₹3,06,494/- from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.40% per annum with monthly rests from 26/05/2022 till the date of decree.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise interest at the rate of 10.40% per annum with monthly rests from 26/05/2022 till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise future interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realisation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is allowed to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document was submitted by the defendant to apply for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed that the loan was sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original of Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The promissory note is evidence of the loan and the defendant's promise to repay.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation of movable
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement provided collateral for the loan taken by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt cum security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as an acknowledgment of the defendant's debt to the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement details the amounts owed by the defendant to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Indian Bank vs Sanish.S.S regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/12/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jyothish Kumar N regarding realisation of money
Court of I st Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won